Sex, Abortions and Health Insurance
Posted by Quang Nguyen
The latest stupefying complication in the health care reform debate comes in the form of the Stupak-Pitts amendment in proposed House legislation that would prohibit companies from offering policies covering abortions in subsidized health insurance exchanges.
Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, has vowed to insert similar language into the Senate version of the bill.
Reproductive rights activists are outraged, but others argue they are overreacting.
What are a few more restrictions on abortion, given what we already have in place? If health insurance reform passes, after all, the expansion of medical services to low-income women, including improved family planning services, would compensate for the risks of paying for abortions out-of-pocket.
Click here to read more
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(25)
-
▼
December
(25)
- Apple Care does not cover smoking damages
- New Health Care Insurance Attempts
- The Value of Insurance
- Universal Health Insurance Costing More Than Antic...
- Insurance Advice
- Expansion of Medicare, Good or Bad?
- Auto Insurance Sales Growing Online
- Separate But Equal? Insurance, Abortion, And Politics
- Too Little , Too Late
- Getting Car Insurance...How Much Is enough?
- Sex, Abortions and Health Insurance
- What My Amendment Won’t Do
- When looking for a job, consider the benefits!
- Senate Turns to Medicare, Medicaid
- Do you need a flood insurance?
- US Senate push to ban abortions on health insurance
- Insurance: Don't get caught without it
- Ways to improve
- Auto Insurance Premium Rate Drops
- Health insurance premiums rise as Congress debates...
- Picking the Correct Medicare Plan is a Challenge
- Michigan Debate Over Proposed Auto Insurance Chang...
- House Committee Passes Federal Insurance Office Act
- Dental Insurance: More important for some, but nec...
- Why it is necessary to have car insurance
-
▼
December
(25)